Understand Factors and Hazards

Psychosocial Factors

What are Psychosocial Factors?

The psychosocial factors described in Guarding Minds are elements that psychologically and/or socially impact the health, safety and well-being of employees, either positively or negatively. Those factors that are within the influence and responsibility of employers can include interactions with co-workers, clients, or management. See What is psychological health and safety? for more information.

What is balance?

In a work environment with positive balance, employees are supported to manage the demands of work, family and personal life.

In an organization with positive balance, employees might say:

  • My employer encourages me to take my entitled breaks.
  • I am able to reasonably balance the demands of work and personal life.
  • My employer promotes work-life balance.
  • I can talk to my supervisor when I am having trouble maintaining work-life balance.
  • I feel supported at work when I am dealing with personal issues.

In an organization with positive balance, employees might NOT say:

  • I feel burned out in my job.
  • My home life suffers because of my work.

Why is balance important?

When employers recognize that work-life balance is important to overall well-being, they realize the benefit to employee focus and productivity. Work-life balance can reduce stress so that work and home issues are less likely to affect each other. These effects have been demonstrated over time, showing a direct causal relationship to physical and psychological health. Organizationally, this translates into enhanced employee commitment, job satisfaction, avoidance of burnout, and improved job performance.

What happens when balance is compromised?

Employees with higher stress levels are more likely to be dissatisfied with work, call in sick or be distracted. One common source of stress is conflict between work and family roles. This conflict can lead to constant tiredness, frustration, and resentment. These can, in turn, lead to workplace injuries, stress-related illnesses, depressive symptoms, and overall decreased health. The impact on the organization can be increased costs due to benefit payouts, absenteeism, disability, and turnover.  

How can balance be improved? 

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-based actions for psychological health and safety, which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve balance.   

Barber, L. K., Conlin, A. L., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2019). Workplace telepressure and work-life balance outcomes: The role of work recovery experiences. Stress and Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/smi.2864
Burton, W. N., Chen, C., Li, X., McCluskey, M., Erickson, D., Barone, D., Schultz, A. B. (2016). Evaluation of a workplace-based sleep education program. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 911-917.
Feeney, M. K., & Stritch, J. M. (2017). Family-friendly policies, gender, and work-life balance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication.   
Haar, J. M., Sune, A., Russo, M., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2019). A cross-national study on the antecedents of work-life balance from the fit and balance perspective. Social Indicators Research, 142, 261-282.
Mansour, S., & Tremblay, D. (2016). How the need for “leisure benefit systems” as a “resource passageways” moderates the effect of work-leisure conflict on job burnout and intention to leave: A study in the hotel industry in Quebec. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 27, 4-11.  
Yu, Y., Manku, M., & Backman, C. L. (2018). Measuring occupational balance and its relationship to perceived stress and health. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 85, 117-127.

What is civility and respect? 

In a work environment with civility and respect, all stakeholders are considerate and fair in their interactions with each other.

In an organization with positive civility and respect, employees might say:  

  • People treat each other with respect at work.
  • My workplace effectively handles conflict among employees.
  • People from all backgrounds are treated fairly in my workplace.
  • My workplace has effective ways of addressing inappropriate behaviour from the people we serve.

Why are civility and respect important?  

A civil and respectful workplace is related to greater perceptions of fairness, more positive attitudes, improved morale, better teamwork, greater interest in personal development, and reduction in sick leave and turnover.

What happens when civility and respect are missing from the workplace?  

When a workplace lacks civility and respect, it can lead to emotional exhaustion amongst employees. In addition to health problems, an uncivil and disrespectful workplace is associated with greater conflict and turnover, plus the threat of more grievances and legal liability.  

How can civility and respect be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-based actions for psychological health and safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve civility and respect.   

Bureau, J. S., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Mageau, G. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and incivility: A multilevel and longitudinal test. Journal of interpersonal violence, 0886260517734219.
Clark, C. M., Sattler, V. P., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2018). Development and Psychometric Testing of the Workplace Civility Index: A Reliable Tool for Measuring Civility in the Workplace. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(9), 400-406.
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522. 
Nagy, M. S., & Curl-Nagy, D. J. (2019). Workplace civility training: An antidote to traditional sexual harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 93-95.

What is clear leadership and expectations?

In a work environment with clear leadership and expectations, employees know what they need to do, have confidence in their leaders and understand impending changes.

In an organization with positive clear leadership and expectations, employees might say:

  • I know what I am expected to do in my job.
  • Difficult situations at work are addressed effectively.
  • I am informed of important changes that may impact how my work is done.
  • My supervisor supports me to do my job successfully.
  • The reasons behind organizational changes are explained.
  • I am told about the impact of organizational change on my job.

Why are clear leadership and expectations important?

Effective leaders support the success of each employee by being clear about expectations, priorities, and impending changes. They promptly and effectively address work issues. This leads to employees working to their full potential with minimal stress, increasing overall productivity and contributing to organizational success.

What happens when clear leadership and expectations are lacking in the workplace?

Leaders who do not set clear expectations are more likely to increase confusion, decrease motivation and cause frustration. These emotions can lead to employees working below their full potential.

How can clear leadership and expectations be improved?

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve leadership and expectations.

Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International journal of productivity and performance management, 63(3), 308.
Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67-75.
Gholz, E. L. (2018). Exploring Strategies Leaders Use to Engage Employees.
Harrell-Cook, G., Levitt, K., & Grimm, J. (2017). From Engagement to Commitment: A New Perspective on the Employee Attitude-Firm Performance Relationship. International Leadership Journal, 9(1).
Health and Safety Executive. (2019). Organisational Culture. In Guidance. Retrieved from https://www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors/topics/culture.htm
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522.
Moullin, J. C., Ehrhart, M. G., & Aarons, G. A. (2018). The role of leadership in organizational implementation and sustainment in service agencies. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(5), 558-567.
Phaneuf, J. É., Boudrias, J. S., Rousseau, V., & Brunelle, É. (2016). Personality and transformational leadership: The moderating effect of organizational context. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 30-35.
Thakur, P. R. (2017). Productivity Tools: Fitness Band for Workplace Engagement, NHRD Network Journal, 10(3), 35-39.

What is engagement?  

In a work environment with positive engagement, employees are motivated to do their job well and feel connected to their work, co-workers, and organization.  

In an organization with positive engagement, employees would say: 

  • I am willing to give extra effort at work if needed.
  • I feel I am part of a community at work.

Why is engagement important?  

Employee engagement is important for individual satisfaction and psychological health. Physical engagement is based on the amount of exertion an employee puts into their job. Emotional engagement is where employees have a positive job outlook and are passionate about their work. Cognitive engagement means employees devote more focus to their work and are absorbed in their jobs. Whatever the source, engaged employees feel connected to their work because they can relate to, and are committed to, the overall success and mission of the organization.  

What happens when employees aren’t engaged?  

Disengaged workers can lead to higher costs due to the impact on mental and physical health. In addition, a workforce that is not engaged is more likely to result in lower productivity, counterproductive behavior, low morale, and employee turnover.

How can engagement be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve engagement.

Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International journal of productivity and performance management, 63(3), 308.
Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67-75.
Gholz, E. L. (2018). Exploring Strategies Leaders Use to Engage Employees.
Harrell-Cook, G., Levitt, K., & Grimm, J. (2017). From Engagement to Commitment: A New Perspective on the Employee Attitude-Firm Performance Relationship. International Leadership Journal, 9(1).
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522.
Thakur, P. R. (2017). Productivity Tools: Fitness Band for Workplace Engagement, NHRD Network Journal, 10(3), 35-39.

What is growth and development?

In a work environment with positive growth and development, employees receive ongoing encouragement and support to enhance interpersonal, emotional and job-related skills.

In an organization with positive growth and development, employees might say:

  • My supervisor supports my personal growth.
  • My supervisor is open to my ideas for taking on new opportunities at work.
  • I have the opportunity to take on new challenges.
  • My employer values employees’ ongoing personal development.
  • I am provided with the necessary training to perform my job well.

Why are growth and development important?

Employee growth and development increase job satisfaction and commitment to the organization. Employees feel their organizations care when they support skill acquisition and personal development. Growth opportunities should extend beyond job performance and include opportunities to learn personal and interpersonal skills critical to psychological health and relationships.

What happens when employees don’t have opportunities for growth and development?

Without opportunities for personal growth and development, employees may grow bored or demotivated. A promotion is not the only – or the best – opportunity for growth and development. In fact, some employees prefer to remain in their current job indefinitely. In other circumstances, there may be no current or future positions available for job advancement. Providing on the job opportunities related to personal growth and development can help.

How can growth and development be improved?

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve growth and development.

Back, A. L., Steinhauser, K. E., Kamal, A. H., & Jackson, V. A. (2016). Building resilience for palliative care clinicians: An approach to burnout prevention based on individual skills and workplace factors. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 52(2), 284–291.
Bindl, U. K. (2019). Work-related proactivity through the lens of narrative: Investigating emotional journeys in the process of making things happen. Human Relations, 72(4), 615–645.
Cummings, G. G., Hewko, S. J., Wang, M., Wong, C. A., Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2018). Impact of managers’ coaching conversations on staff knowledge use and performance in long term care settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(1), 62–71.
Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D. L., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2017). Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1686–1718.
Pitichat, T., Reichard, R. J., Kea-Edwards, A., Middleton, E., & Norman, S. M. (2018). Psychological capital for leader development. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1), 47–62.

What is involvement and influence?  

In a work environment with positive involvement and influence, employees are included in discussions and have input into decisions that impact their respective jobs.

In an organization with positive involvement and influence, employees might say:

  • I have a say in how I will manage organizational changes that affect me.
  • I have some control over how I organize my work.
  • My suggestions are considered at work.
  • I am informed about important changes at work in a timely manner.
  • I am encouraged to participate in decisions that impact my work.

Why are involvement and influence important?  

When employees feel they have meaningful input into their work they are more likely to be engaged, have higher morale, and take pride in their organization. This, in turn, increases their willingness to put in extra effort when required. Job involvement is associated with increased psychological well-being, enhanced innovation, and organizational commitment.  

What happens when employees lack involvement and influence?  

If employees do not believe they have any influence at work, they are likely to feel a sense of indifference or helplessness. Job alienation, or non-involvement, is associated with cynicism and distress, greater turnover, and burnout.  

How can involvement and influence be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve involvement and influence.

Canadian Standards Association. (2013). Psychological health and safety in the workplace-Prevention, Promotion and guidance to staged implementation (National Standards of Canada). CAN/CSA-Z1003-13.
García, G. A., Gonzales-Miranda, D. R., Gallo, O., & Roman-Calderon, J. P. (2019). Employee involvement and job satisfaction: a tale of the millennial generation. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(3), 374-388.
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522.
Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42(4), 982-1004.

What is organizational culture?

In a work environment with positive organizational culture, there are shared values of trust, honesty, fairness and accountability.

In an organization with positive organizational culture, employees might say:

  • People in my organization are held accountable for their actions.
  • Employees and management trust one another.
  • Organizational values are demonstrated at all levels.

Why is organizational culture important?  

Ultimately, positive organizational culture can lead to the attraction and retention of talent. In an age of social media, how employees feel about their organization can have an immediate impact on the reputation of an organization. When employees trust their employer to protect their psychological safety and uphold the values that they claim to embrace, they are more likely to feel proud of and committed to their organization.  

What happens when a workplace does not have good organizational culture?  

Culture sets the tone for an organization; if that culture is negative it may be more challenging to attract and retain talent. Increasingly, the reputation of organizations also influences decisions by investors and shareholders that can impact the bottom line.  

How can organizational culture be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve organizational culture.

Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2015). Changing organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. Routledge.
Canadian Standards Association. (2013). Psychological health and safety in the workplace-Prevention, Promotion and guidance to staged implementation (National Standards of Canada). CAN/CSA-Z1003-13.
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522.
Kunyk, D., Craig-Broadwith, M., Morris, H., Diaz, R., Reisdorfer, E., & Wang, J. (2016). Employers’ perceptions and attitudes toward the Canadian national standard on psychological health and safety in the workplace: A qualitative study. International journal of law and psychiatry, 44, 41-47.
Maldonado, T., Vera, D., & Ramos, N. (2018). How humble is your company culture? And, why does it matter? Business Horizons, 61(5), 745-753.
Warrick, D. D. (2017). What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business Horizons, 60(3), 395-404.

What is protection of physical safety?

In a work environment with positive protection of physical safety, management takes appropriate action to protect all employees against injury and illness and ensures they have what they need to do their jobs safely.

In an organization with positive protection of physical safety, employees might say:

  • When physical risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.
  • People at work understand the importance of protecting employee physical safety.
  • I have what I need to do my job safely.

Why is protection of physical safety important?  

Employees feel more secure and engaged when they know their physical health and safety is protected at work. Adequate tools and equipment, training on physical safety and trust that the employer minimizes and controls physical hazards are all part of this. It’s also important that employees have meaningful input into workplace policies and practices and know their employer will respond quickly and effectively to health and safety risks and incidents.

What happens when employees’ physical safety is not protected? 

Employees who do not feel protected are more vulnerable to psychological distress and potential mental health problems. This is in addition to the obvious risk of injury and illness.

How can protection of physical safety be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve protection of physical safety.

Amick III, B. C., Lee, H., Hogg-Johnson, S., Katz, J. N., Brouwer, S., France, R., & Bültmann, Ute. (2017). How do organizational policies and practices affect return to work and work role functioning following a musculoskeletal injury? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27, 393-404.
Bailey, T. S., Dollard, M. F., McLinton, S. S., & Richards, P. A. M. (2015). Psychosocial safety climate, psychosocial and physical factors in the aetiology of musculoskeletal disorder symptoms and workplace injury compensation claims. Work & Stress, 29, 190-211.
Carleton, R. N., Afifi, T. O., Taillieu, T., Turner, S., Krakauer, R., Anderson, G. S., McCreary, D. R. (2019). Exposures to potentially traumatic events among public safety personnel in Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 51, 37-52.
Haynes, E., Kramer, D. M., Strahlendorf, P., Holmes, D. L., Kushner, R., & Tenkate, T. (2018). A cross-Canada knowledge transfer and exchange workplace intervention targeting the adoption of sun safety programs and practice: Sun Safety at Work Canada. Safety Science, 102, 238-250.
Smith, P. M., Saunders, R., Lifshen, M., Black, O., Lay, M., Breslin, C. F., Tompa, E. (2015). The development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety vulnerability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 82, 234-243.
Wong, M., Saari, M., Patterson, E., Puts, M., & Tourangeau, A. E. (2017). Occupational hazards for home care nurses across the rural-to-urban gradient in Ontario, Canada. Health and Social Care in the Community, 25, 1276-1286.

What is psychological and social support?  

In a work environment with positive psychological and social support, all employees feel a sense of belonging and contribution.

In an organization with positive psychological and social support, employees might say:

  • When psychological risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.
  • People in my workplace understand the importance of protecting employee psychological safety.
  • People with mental health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • People with physical health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • My employer helps employees cope with workplace stress.

In an organization with positive psychological and social support, employees might NOT say:

  • I feel lonely when working.

Why are psychological and social support important? 

Employees who feel they have psychological and social support often have greater job commitment, satisfaction, and involvement. Psychological and social support may be especially helpful in protecting against traumatic stressors at work because employees will be more likely to seek and receive appropriate help. If work absence is required, return to work is often quicker and more sustainable.  

What happens when employees lack psychological and social support? 

Lack of psychological and social support at work can lead to increases in absenteeism, strain, conflict, and turnover. It can lead to fatigue, burnout, anxiety and other health issues. Lack of psychological and social support can also result in delayed help-seeking, loss of productivity, increased costs and more incidents, accidents and injuries.

How can psychological and social support be improved? 

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve psychological and social support.

Bronkhorst, B., & Vermeeren, B. (2016). Safety climate, worker health and organizational health performance: Testing a physical, psychosocial and combined pathway. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9, 270-289.
Chen, Y., McCabe, B., & Hyatt, D. (2017). Impact of individual resilience and safety climate on safety performance and psychological stress of construction workers: A case study of the Ontario construction industry. Journal of Safety Research, 61, 167-176.
Dollard, M. F., Dormann, C., Tuckey, M. R., & Escartin, J. (2017). Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and enacted PSC for workplace bullying and psychological health problem reduction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 844-857.
Ott-Holland, C. J., Shepherd, W. J., & Ryan, A. M. (2019). Examining wellness programs over time: Predicting participation and workplace outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24, 163-179.
Pek, S., Turner, N., Tucker, S., Kelloway, E. K., & Morrish, J. (2017). Injunctive safety norms, young worker risk-taking behaviors, and workplace injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 106, 202-210.

What are psychological competencies and demands? 

In a work environment where psychological competencies and demands are not a health risk, employees are continually supported to meet the psychological demands of their position.

In an organization with positive psychological competencies and demands, employees might say:

  • Management appointments consider the “people skills” necessary for specific positions.
  • I am able to do my job in a way that aligns with my values.

In an organization with positive psychological competencies and demands, employees might NOT say:

My work threatens my psychological health.

Why are psychological competencies and demands important?  

A good fit between employees’ psychological competencies and the demands of the position they hold is associated with enhanced performance, job satisfaction and employee retention. Physical health complaints, depression and poor morale can all be reduced by supporting the ongoing management of both psychological competencies and work demands.

What happens when there is a poor fit between employees’ psychological competencies and the demands of the position they hold? 

When an employee has not been adequately supported to develop the psychological competencies for the demands of their position, it may result in job strain. This strain can be expressed as excessive stress, cynicism, defensiveness, burnout, and fatigue.

How can psychological competencies and demands be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve psychological compentencies and demands.

Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2016). Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement. Society for Human Resource Management and Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2-22.
Health and Safety Executive. (2012). Work related stress – together we can tackle it. In Guidance. Retrieved from http://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/index.htm
International Federation of Red Cross & Red Crescent Societies. (2019). Psychological First Aid Pocket Guide. Retrieved from http://www.toolkitsportdevelopment.org/html/resources/2C/2C4783F0-083B-4382-8DED- D99AEC37B0F2/pspmanual_module1.pdf
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., Michaud, K., & Dobreva Martinova, T. (2018). A Measure and Model of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace that Reflects Canada’s National Standard. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 35(4), 509-522.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of management, 43(6), 1854-1884.
Neves, P., Mesdaghinia, S., Eisenberger, R., & Wickham, R. E. (2018). Time sizing Proximity and Perceived Organizational Support: Contributions to Employee Well-being and Extra-role Performance. Journal of Change Management, 18(1), 70-90.
Ullah, Z., Khan, M. Z., & Siddique, M. (2017). Analysis of Employees’ Perception of Workplace Support and Level of Motivation in Public Sector Healthcare Organization. Business & Economic Review, 9(3), 240-257.

What is psychological protection? 

In a work environment with adequate psychological protection, employees are free from bullying, harassment, stigma and discrimination.

In an organization with positive psychological protection, employees might say:

  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from discrimination.
  • It is safe to speak up at work.
  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from bullying.

In an organization with positive psychological protection, employees might NOT say:

  • I am currently being treated unfairly at work because I have a mental illness.
  • I am currently being bullied at work.
  • I am currently being harassed (verbally, physically, or sexually) at work.
  • I am currently experiencing discrimination at work.

Why is psychological protection important?

When employees are psychologically protected, they demonstrate greater job satisfaction, enhanced team learning behavior, and improved performance. Employees feel safe to speak up about both concerns and ideas. They show increased morale and engagement and are less likely to experience stress-related illness. Psychologically protected workplaces also experience fewer grievances, conflicts, and liability risks.

What happens when employees’ psychological safety is not protected?

When employees are not psychologically safe, they experience demoralization, a sense of threat, disengagement, and strain. They perceive workplace conditions as ambiguous and unpredictable. The organization is at a much greater risk of lawsuits and regulatory penalties. This can, in turn, undermine shareholder, consumer, and public confidence in the organization.

How can psychological protection be improved?

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve psychological protection.

Allen, R., Watt, F., Jansen, B., Coghlan, E., & Nathan, E. A. (2017). Minimising compassion fatigue in obstetrics/gynecology doctors: Exploring an intervention for an occupational hazard. Australasian Psychiatry, 25, 403-406.
Barr, P. (2017). Compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in neonatal intensive care unit nurses: Relationships with work stress and perceived social support. Traumatology, 23, 214-222.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Jimmieson, N. L., Tucker, M. K., & Walsh, A. J. (2017). Interaction effects among multiple job demands: An examination of healthcare workers across different contexts. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30, 317-332.
Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 772-786.
Lawrie, E. J., Tuckey, M. R., & Dollard, M. F. (2018). Job design for mindful work: The boosting effect of psychosocial safety climate. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23, 483-495.
Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42, 706-724.

What is recognition and reward? 

In a work environment with positive recognition and reward, there is appropriate acknowledgement and appreciation of employees’ efforts in a fair and timely manner.

In an organization with positive recognition and reward, employees might say:

  • I am paid fairly for the work I do.
  • Our organization celebrates our shared accomplishments.
  • I am recognized for good performance.

Why are recognition and reward important?  

Effective recognition and reward can motivate and enhance performance. When employees value the type of recognition they receive it can increase energy and enthusiasm and build a greater sense of pride at work. When pay is adequate, monetary reward is not usually the most effective form of motivation. Praise, acknowledgement, and opportunities for growth and development may be more effective.  

What happens when employees don’t receive appropriate recognition and reward? 

When employees believe their efforts are not appreciated it can undermine their confidence and their commitment to the organization. An imbalance between effort and reward is a significant contributor to burnout and emotional distress, leading to a range of psychological and physical disorders. Employees may feel demoralized or may resign.

How can recognition and reward be improved? 

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve recognition and reward.

Fehr, R., Fulmer, A., Awtrey, E., & Miller, J. A. (2017). The grateful workplace: A multilevel model of gratitude in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 361–381.
Kranabetter, C., & Niessen, C. (2019). Appreciation and depressive symptoms: The moderating role of need satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
Landry, A. T., Kindlein, J., Trépanier, S.-G., Forest, J., Zigarmi, D., Houson, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2016). Why individuals want money is what matters: Using self-determination theory to explain the differential relationship between motives for making money and employee psychological health. Motivation and Emotion, 40(2), 226–242.
Merino, M. D., & Privado, J. (2015). Does employee recognition affect positive psychological functioning and well-being? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18.
Proell, C. A., Sauer, S., & Rodgers, M. S. (2016). Credit where credit is due: A field survey of the interactive effects of credit expectations and leaders’ credit allocation on employee turnover. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 341–355.
Stocker, D., Keller, A. C., Meier, L. L., Elfering, A., Pfister, I. B., Jacobshagen, N., & Semmer, N. K. (2018). Appreciation by supervisors buffers the impact of work interruptions on well-being longitudinally. International Journal of Stress Management.

What is workload management?  

In a work environment where there is positive workload management, employees feel supported to complete their assigned tasks and responsibilities successfully.

In an organization with positive workload management, employees might say:

  • The amount of work I am expected to do is reasonable for my position.
  • I can talk to my supervisor about the amount of work I have to do.
  • I have sufficient time to complete my work.
  • Deadlines are reasonable.
  • The frequency of staff turnover is reasonable for our sector.
  • I feel my job is secure.
  • I can do my job effectively with the tools and equipment provided.

Why is workload management important? 

Supportive workload management optimizes each employee’s energy and focus. Clarity about work priorities, the necessary resources and adequate time to accomplish the job successfully are provided. When fear, pressure and distractions are eliminated, employees are free to concentrate on the task at hand.

What happens when employees can’t manage their workload? 

Higher emotional, psychological and physical demands at work require greater levels of control for the employee. Without this balance, there can be an increase in feelings of inadequacy, fatigue, stress and strain. This can result in demoralization and turnover.

How can workload management be improved?  

Start by assessing where it is now. You can do this by conducting an Organizational Review and/or the Survey. If you are ready to implement changes, refer to Evidence-Based Actions for Psychological Health and Safety which provides practical strategies and free resources to improve workload management.

Arnold, K. A., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Walsh, M. M., & Withey, M. J. (2017). Using a pattern oriented approach to study leaders: Implications for burnout and perceived role demand. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 1038–1056.
Bowling, N. A., Alarcon, G. M., Bragg, C. B., & Hartman, M. J. (2015). A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & Stress, 29(2), 95–113.
Chamberlain, S. A., Gruneir, A., Hoben, M., Squires, J. E., Cummings, G. G., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2017). Influence of organizational context on nursing home staff burnout: A cross-sectional survey of care aides in Western Canada. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 71, 60–69.
Day, A., Crown, S. N., & Ivany, M. (2017). Organisational change and employee burnout: The moderating effects of support and job control. Safety Science, 100 (Part A), 4–12.
Health and Safety Executive. (2019). Human Factors: Workload. In Guidance. Retrieved from https://www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors/topics/workload.htm
Sandrin, É., Gillet, N., Fernet, C., Leloup, M., & Depin, R. C. (2019). Effects of motivation and workload on firefighters’ perceived health, stress, and performance. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.
Wilkes, S. M., Barber, L. K., & Rogers, A. P. (2018). Development and validation of the Workplace Interruptions Measure. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 34(1), 102–114.

The psychosocial factors were intentionally written in the positive for the most part to contribute to solution-based thinking and avoid increasing dissatisfaction. The occupational health and safety process includes hazard identification which is described below. Note that the same validated Guarding Minds survey statements included in psychosocial factors are used in psychosocial hazards.

Psychosocial Hazards

What are psychosocial hazards?

In International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 45003:20211 – Occupational Health and Safety Management – Psychological Health and Safety at Work – Guidelines for Managing Psychosocial Risks, clause 6.1.2.1 covers psychosocial hazard identification. In this standard it states that “the organization should understand the underlying sources of harm before control measures are considered to improve the effectiveness of activities to manage psychosocial risk.”

What follows is an independent interpretation of how you might use hazard identification to inform your approach to psychological health and safety. The results in your Guarding Minds at Work survey will point to employee concerns related to these psychosocial hazards but will not identify the specific individuals or circumstances involved.

There are many ways to understand the underlying sources of harm, but the most critical is a discussion with employees about the issues identified. Employees are also a great source of practical and relevant solutions. Many resources are available to help guide and support a facilitated employee discussion such as the On the agenda workshop series.


1International Organization for Standardization. (2021). Occupational health and safety management — Psychological health and safety at work — Guidelines for managing psychosocial risks (ISO Standard No. 45003). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/64283.html

Examples of how bullying/harassment may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • unwanted, offensive, intimidating behaviours (sexual or non-sexual in nature) which relate to one or more specific characteristics of the targeted individual, e.g.:
    • race
    • gender
    • religion or belief
    • sexual orientation
    • disability
    • age
  • repeated (more than once) unreasonable behaviours which can present a risk to health, safety and well-being at work; behaviours can be overt or covert, e.g.:
    • social or physical isolation
    • assigning meaningless or unfavourable tasks
    • name calling, insults and intimidation
    • undermining behaviour
    • undue public criticism
    • withholding information or resources critical for one’s job
    • malicious rumours or gossiping
    • assigning impossible deadlines

In an organization where bullying/harassment is MORE likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am currently being bullied at work.
  • I am currently being harassed (verbally, physically, or sexually) at work.
  • I am currently experiencing discrimination at work.

Note: Bullying and harassment can occur both face to face and electronically (e.g., online meetings, social media).

Examples of how career development may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • career stagnation and uncertainty, under-promotion or over-promotion, lack of opportunity for skill development

In an organization where career development is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I have the opportunity to take on new challenges.
  • My employer values employees’ ongoing personal development.
  • I am provided with the necessary training to perform my job well.

Examples of how civility and respect may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of trust, honesty, respect, civility and fairness
  • lack of respect and consideration in interactions among workers, as well as with customers, clients and the public

In an organization where civility and respect are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • People treat each other with respect at work.
  • People from all backgrounds are treated fairly in my workplace.
  • Employees and management trust one another.

Examples of how harm may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • incidents involving an explicit or implicit challenge to health, safety or well-being at work; violence can be internal, external or client initiated, e.g.:
    • abuse
    • threats
    • assault (physical, verbal or sexual)
    • gender-based violence

In an organization where harm is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from discrimination.
  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from bullying.
  • My workplace has effective ways of addressing inappropriate behaviour from the people we serve.

Note: In the ISO 45003:20211, Harm is called violence at work. To capture the psychological harm that can come from emotional or verbal violence, we modified the name of this psychosocial hazard.

Examples of how interpersonal relationships may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • poor communication, including poor information sharing
  • poor relationships between managers, supervisors, co-workers, and clients or others that workers interact with
  • interpersonal conflict
  • harassment, bullying, victimization (including using electronic tools such as email and social media), third-party violence
  • lack of social support
  • unequal power relationships between dominant and non-dominant groups of workers
  • social or physical isolation

In an organization where interpersonal relationships are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My workplace effectively handles conflict among employees.
  • Difficult situations at work are addressed effectively.

In an organization where interpersonal relationships are MORE likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am currently being treated unfairly at work because I have a mental illness.

Examples of how job control or autonomy may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • limited opportunity to participate in decision-making
  • lack of control over workload
  • low levels of influence and independence (e.g., not being able to influence the speed, order or schedule of work tasks and workload)

In an organization where job control or autonomy are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I have some control over how I organize my work.
  • I am encouraged to participate in decisions that impact my work.

Examples of how job demands may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • underuse of skills
  • continual work exposure to interaction with people (e.g., the public, customers, students, patients)
  • having too much to do within a certain time or with a set number of workers
  • conflicting demands and deadlines
  • unrealistic expectations of a worker’s competence or responsibilities
  • lack of task variety or performing highly repetitive tasks
  • fragmented or meaningless work
  • requirements for excessive periods of alertness and concentration
  • working with aggressive or distressed people
  • exposure to events or situations that can cause trauma

In an organization where job demands are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am able to do my job in a way that aligns with my values.

In an organization where job demands are MORE likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I feel burned out in my job.
  • My work threatens my psychological health.

Examples of how job security and precarious work may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • uncertainty regarding work availability, including work without set hours
  • possibility of redundancy or temporary loss of work with reduced pay
  • low-paid or insecure employment, including non-standard employment
  • working in situations that are not properly covered or protected by labour law or social protection

In an organization where job security and precarious work are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • It is safe to speak up at work.
  • The frequency of staff turnover is reasonable for our sector.
  • I feel my job is secure.

Examples of how leadership may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of clear vision and objectives
  • management style unsuited to the nature of the work and its demands
  • failing to listen or only casually listening to complaints and suggestions
  • withholding information
  • providing inadequate communication and support
  • lack of accountability
  • lack of fairness
  • inconsistent and poor decision-making practices
  • abuse or misuse of power

In an organization where leadership is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My suggestions are considered at work.
  • People in my organization are held accountable for their actions.
  • Organizational values are demonstrated at all levels.

Examples of how organizational change management may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of practical support provided to assist workers during transition periods
  • prolonged or recurring restructuring
  • lack of consultation and communication about workplace changes, or consultation and communication which is of poor quality, untimely or not meaningful

In an organization where organizational change management is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • The reasons behind organizational changes are explained.
  • I am told about the impact of organizational change on my job.
  • I have a say in how I will manage organizational changes that affect me.

Examples of how organizational and workgroup culture may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • poor communication
  • low levels of support for problem-solving and personal development
  • lack of definition of, or agreement on, organizational objectives
  • inconsistent and untimely application of policies and procedures, unfair decision-making

In an organization where organizational and workgroup culture are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I feel I am part of a community at work.
  • People in my workplace understand the importance of protecting employee psychological safety.
  • Management appointments consider the “people skills” necessary for specific positions.
  • When psychological risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.

Examples of how remote and isolated work may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • working in locations that are far from home, family, friends and usual support networks (e.g., isolated working or “fly-in-fly-out” work arrangements)
  • working alone in non-remote locations without social/human interaction at work (e.g., working at home)
  • working in private homes (e.g., providing care or domestic roles in other people’s homes)

In an organization where remote and isolated work are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I can do my job effectively with the tools and equipment provided.

In an organization where remote and isolated work are MORE likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My home life suffers because of my work.
  • I feel lonely when working.

Examples of how recognition and reward may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • imbalance between workers’ effort and formal and informal recognition and reward
  • lack of appropriate acknowledgement and appreciation of workers’ efforts in a fair and timely manner

In an organization where recognition and reward are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am paid fairly for the work I do.
  • Our organization celebrates our shared accomplishments.
  • I am recognized for good performance.

Examples of how roles and expectations may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • role ambiguity
  • role conflict
  • duty of care for other people
  • scenarios where workers do not have clear guidelines on the tasks they are expected to do (and not do)
  • expectations within a role that undermine one another (e.g., being expected to provide good customer service, but also to not spend a long time with customers)
  • uncertainty about, or frequent changes to, tasks and work standards
  • performing work of little value or purpose

In an organization where roles and expectations are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I know what I am expected to do in my job.
  • I am informed of important changes that may impact how my work is done.
  • I am informed about important changes at work in a timely manner.

Examples of how supervision may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of constructive performance feedback and evaluation processes
  • lack of encouragement/acknowledgement
  • lack of communication
  • lack of shared organizational vision and clear objectives
  • lack of support and/or resources to facilitate improvements in performance
  • lack of fairness
  • misuse of digital surveillance

In an organization where supervision is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My supervisor supports me to do my job successfully.
  • My supervisor supports my personal growth.
  • My supervisor is open to my ideas for taking on new opportunities at work.

Examples of how support may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of support from supervisors and co-workers
  • lack of access to support services
  • lack of information/training to support work performance

In an organization where support is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I feel supported at work when I am dealing with personal issues.
  • People with mental health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • People with physical health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • My employer helps employees cope with workplace stress.

Examples of how work environment, equipment and hazardous tasks may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • inadequate equipment availability, suitability, reliability, maintenance or repair
  • poor workplace conditions such as lack of space, poor lighting and excessive noise
  • lack of the necessary tools, equipment or other resources to complete work tasks
  • working in extreme conditions or situations, such as very high or low temperatures, or at height
  • working in unstable environments such as conflict zones

In an organization where work environment, equipment and hazardous tasks are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • When physical risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.
  • I have what I need to do my job safely.
  • People at work understand the importance of protecting employee physical safety.

Examples of how work/life balance may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • work tasks, roles, schedules or expectations that cause workers to continue working on their own time
  • conflicting demands of work and home
  • work that impacts the workers’ ability to recover

In an organization where work/life balance is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am able to reasonably balance the demands of work and personal life.
  • My employer promotes work-life balance.
  • I can talk to my supervisor when I am having trouble maintaining work-life balance.

Examples of how working hours and schedule may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • lack of variety of work
  • shift work
  • inflexible work schedules
  • unpredictable hours
  • long or unsociable hours
  • fragmented work or work that is not meaningful
  • continual requirements to complete work at short notice

In an organization where working hours and schedule are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I am willing to give extra effort at work if needed.
  • I have sufficient time to complete my work.
  • Deadlines are reasonable.

Examples of how workload and work pace may be a psychosocial hazard include:

  • work overload or underload
  • high levels of time pressure
  • continually subject to deadlines
  • machine pacing
  • high level of repetitive work

In an organization where workload and work pace are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • My employer encourages me to take my entitled breaks.
  • The amount of work I am expected to do is reasonable for my position.
  • I can talk to my supervisor about the amount of work I have to do.

Indicators for Workplace Inclusion

Some of the statements used in the psychosocial factors are especially relevant for indicating the extent to which employees feel they belong and are respected in your organization. Survey results are organized to help you consider approaches to improving inclusion.

In an organization where workplace inclusion is less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • People treat each other with respect at work.
  • People from all backgrounds are treated fairly in my workplace.
  • I feel I am part of a community at work.
  • My suggestions are considered at work.
  • I do not feel lonely when working.
  • People with mental health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • People with physical health issues are supported to do their jobs effectively.
  • I am able to do my job in a way that aligns with my values.
  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from discrimination.
  • It is safe to speak up at work.
  • My employer makes efforts to prevent harm to employees from bullying.
  • I am not being treated unfairly at work because I have a mental illness at work.
  • I am not being bullied at work.
  • I am not being harassed (verbally, physically, or sexually) at work.
  • I am not experiencing discrimination at work.
  • I am recognized for good performance.

Indicators for Workplace Stress and Trauma

Some of the statements used in the psychosocial factors are especially relevant for indicating the extent to which employees feel stressed or traumatized in your organization. Survey results are organized to help you consider approaches to protecting employees from exposure to stressful or traumatic incidents.

In an organization where workplace stress and trauma are less likely to be a psychosocial risk, employees might say:

  • I do not feel burned out in my job.
  • My workplace effectively handles conflict among employees.
  • My workplace has effective ways of addressing inappropriate behaviour from the people we serve.
  • Difficult situations at work are addressed effectively.
  • When physical risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.
  • When psychological risks are identified, my employer responds effectively.
  • I am provided with the necessary training to perform my job well.
  • People in my organization are held accountable for their actions.
  • People at work understand the importance of protecting employee physical safety.
  • I have what I need to do my job safely.
  • People in my workplace understand the importance of protecting employee psychological safety.
  • My employer helps employees cope with workplace stress.
  • Management appointments consider the “people skills” necessary for specific positions.
  • My work does not threaten my psychological health.
  • I am able to do my job in a way that aligns with my values.
  • My homelife does not suffer because of my work.
  • It is safe to speak up at work.
  • I have sufficient time to complete my work.
  • Deadlines are reasonable.
  • I feel my job is secure.

Guarding Minds at Work